I think there is nothing bad in doing things for money...to an extant. When it's ALL about the money, it becomes less...special as you said...
But at the same time I'd love to be able to live off my art. I'd still prefer having an average salary but making things I truly love, than becoming rich off something I kinda feel "meh" about. (however I might fit in the stereotypical artist type, as I'm studying in fine arts, but I just value fun over everything!)
Thanks for writing your thoughts, and I love cookies. xD Have a good day/night/afternoon!
I'm a graphic designer, so it's not verbatim the case of which you speak, but I don't have formal training. Am I the best graphic designer around? No. Am I always learning and improving my skills? Yes. What makes me cringe is when an "artist" or "graphic designer" boasts about their extensive, robust formal training - yet their work still sucks. They're screwing up simple color schemes and basic anatomy. So what's the excuse there?
Don't fault people for taking pride in the fact that they don't have formal training, yet are still talented - fault them when they can't back it up, and fault the "trained" artists and designers just the same. It doesn't matter how well trained or educated you are - if you can't keep up, if you can't keep learning, you shouldn't be boasting.
I cringe every time a trained artist or designer gets uppity and thinks they're automatically better than those that have not had formal training.
I cringe every time a trained artist or designer gets uppity and thinks they're automatically better than those that have not had formal training.
I don't think the OP was taking that particular stance as far as thinking she is above ANYONE for that matter, much less people who didn't go to an art school and "learned their craft" independently.
If ANYTHING, artists who boast about "not being trained" are the ones who are uppity and look down their noses at people who HAVE gone to school/have had proper training as if THEY are better because they "didn't need help" or something like that.
Bottom line; you took offense where it wasn't necessary to do so.
While I respect Kidrobot for the huge impact its had in the industry, I personally don't always like the art they promote, and who cares? I don't have to buy art I don't like. When push comes to shove, KR is a company that provides a product that people want and will act as such. Its like complaining that Starbucks isn't a local coffee shop. As a business its going to care about growing and expanding which means making money, hiring more people, opening new shops, and trying to please more and more people. The fact that they bring in up and coming artists at all is pretty cool. Sure, the new artists probably won't get much any money off it, but the promotion is HUGE and worth more then a slightly fatter paycheck. If you are tired of production toy art, I suggest checking out self producing toy artists like Squink, Chris Ryniak, Amanda Viselle, ect.
Kidrobot is like starbucks and independent artists are like your local coffee shop, it all depends on what experience you are looking for. The smaller coffee shop isn't making bank, just enough to get by while doing what they love and building a closer community base. As a consumer you have the power to support whomever you choose.

DIY Zukie
Tekken Bishoujo Alisa Bosconovitch
Pobber Toys' Dr. Morkenstein Pajamas Ver.
Nendoroid Millhiore F. Biscotti
Good Smile Company's 1/4 Nanoha
Square Enix's Play Arts Kai Cyborg Ninja
Square Enix's Play Arts Kai Solid Snake
Video Banpresto's Super DX Celebi plush
Max Factory's Miku Append
Aegis ART WORKS Ver. by Alter
Throwback: figma R. Dorothy Wayneright
Marvel Bishoujo Statue Elektra
Togainu no Chi's Akira by Kotobukiya
Shining Hearts Rufina by Kotobukiya
Yamato's Ritual
[NSFW] Yamato's Luna
NECA's Evil Dead 2 series one
S.H. Figuarts Kamen Rider #2
Blazblue Jubei Plush
Goofy Grin Monsters


Tomocast 35: Listener Questions


6:00 PM on 06.13.2011
|



